Recently, FDA published a guidance (entitled “Design and Analysis of Shedding Studies for Virus or Bacteria-Based Gene Therapy and Oncolytic Products”) providing sponsors with recommendations on how and when to conduct shedding studies during preclinical and clinical development.
According to the guidance, the term “shedding” refers to the “release of Virus or bacteria-based gene therapy (VBGT) or oncolytic products from the patient through one or more of the following ways: excreta (feces), secreta (urine, saliva, nasopharyngeal fluids, etc.), or through the skin (pustules, sores, wounds).” The guidance also states that “shedding is distinct from biodistribution because the latter describes how a product is spread within the patient’s body from the site of administration while the former describes how it is excreted or released from the patient’s body.”
Shedding increases the risk of transmission of the VBGT or oncolytic products from treated to untreated individuals. Although these products are less infectious or virulent as the parent strains, the possibility that viruses and bacteria may be shed by a patient increases concerns regarding risk of transmission from treated to untreated individuals.
In the guidance, FDA states that the decision to require and assess shedding data is based on the biological characteristics, derivation, and genetic makeup of the VBGT or oncolytic product. It also states that shedding data may be requested if:
FDA also outlines what is needed from shedding studies to determine the likelihood of transmission. The key aspects in designing the studies include: “the choice of clinical samples that are collected from subjects in a trial (e.g., feces, urine, nasal swabs); the frequency of sample collection and duration of the monitoring period and the assay methodology selected to test for the presence of the shed in the clinical sample.”
The guidance offers information regarding when to collect shedding data in clinical studies, analytical assays to measure shedding, how to analyze shedding data, what to include in a clinical shedding study report, what information can be used to assess the potential for transmission, and how to monitor untreated individuals for transmission. For more information or the full details, view the full guidance here.
These recommendations are nonbinding and are not legally enforceable responsibilities; however, the document does describe FDA’s current thinking on the topic and contains suggestions and recommendations. If you need assistance ensuring you are compliant with this or any other guidance document, we can help. To learn more about how we can use our unique approach, which combines scientific knowledge with regulatory expertise, to help you establish and maintain compliance, please contact us.
March 31, 2015
Commonly during drug development, significant issues arise for which FDA input is desired but that do not merit a full face-to-face multidisciplinary milestone meeting. In many cases, sponsors are...
February 19, 2016
According to a recent study by JAMA Internal Medicine, the use of surgical mesh for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) has decreased after a “strongly” worded severe safety alert was...
August 20, 2015
After the FDA passed the Orphan Drug Act in 1983, the number of orphan drugs (drugs indicated for the treatment of rare diseases that affect 200,000 people or less in the United States) submitted to...