April 19, 2016
On September 27, 2007, the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA IV) reauthorization and expansion was signed into law, significantly strengthening FDA’s drug safety program. As part of the reauthorization, FDA committed to a number of performance goals, which included its obligation to “implement measures to reduce medication errors related to look-alike and sound-alike proprietary names, unclear label abbreviations, acronyms, dose designations, and error-prone labeling and packaging designs.”
In an effort to achieve its PDUFA IV performance goals, FDA is developing a series of three planned guidances aimed at minimizing the risks that contribute to medication errors. The three guidances will focus on the following topics:
On April 11, 2016, FDA published the first guidance in this series. The guidance, entitled “Safety Considerations for Product Design to Minimize Medication Errors,” offers broad recommendations regarding the development of drug and biologic products, and applies to:
In its guidance, FDA provides “a set of principles for using a systems approach to minimize medication errors relating to product design and container closure design and thus enhance patient safety.” Furthermore, FDA states that its recommendations “are intended to provide best practices on how to improve the drug product and container closure design for all prescription and nonprescription drugs and biologic products regulated by the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER).”
Many medication errors can be avoided by simply looking at past errors and learning from the mistakes through the conduct of a proactive risk assessment before marketing a drug. Although the guidance does not describe how to conduct, document, or submit these assessments, nor does it detail how they will be evaluated if conducted and submitted, FDA does provide valuable information regarding proactive risk assessments.
The guidance states that proactive risk assessments “should be employed from the earliest stages of product design to help manufacturers anticipate potential use-related medication errors, identify the need for iterative design modifications, and ensure that such modifications do not introduce unintended consequences.” Ideally, assessments that use an analytical approach should occur as early in the product design development process as possible. FDA notes that sponsors and applicants can reduce post approval safety issues by considering the needs of end users, environments of use, and contexts of use when developing and designing a drug product.
FDA recommends that applicants and sponsors use failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) and simulated use testing (i.e., human factors or user testing) “to identify medication error concerns relating to product design and the container closure.”
“FMEA is a systematic evaluation of the proposed product within the medication use system and provides an understanding of the relative impact of different types of system failures that may affect use-related medication error and prioritization of risk.” In addition, FMEA provides a multidisciplinary review that considers everyone in the medication use process, and includes:
The recommended steps for conducting use-related medication error FMEA can be found in the Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Health Care and Patient Safety.
“Simulated use testing involves systematic collection of data from representative end users’ realistic use of early, interim, or final product designs, including product labels and labeling.” The test assesses the product’s actual use and expands on the results of other analytical approaches, such as FMEA. As such, the results of stimulated use tests should be used to update the FMEA to include additional use-related risks that were not previously anticipated. Applicants and sponsors should use stimulated use testing when determining whether the product design enables or hinders end users from safely and correctly performing the product’s critical tasks.
In addition to right before a product is submitted for approval, FDA states that risk assessments “should also be conducted before any subsequent product modifications such as additions to a product line (e.g., adding an extended release formulation), changes to a currently marketed product (e.g., new strength, new dosage form, new packaging configuration, new indication, new delivery system).”
In its guidance, FDA provides a number of recommendations concerning what should be considered during the early stages of drug product design in order to minimize medication errors.
Interested in learning more? Part two, entitled "Minimizing Medication Errors Related to Product Design, Part Two: FDA’s Early Stage Product Design Considerations," has everything you need to know about early stage product design considerations.
February 15, 2018
Throughout 2017, the FDA focused its attention on the regulation of generic drug products. In 2015, the Agency issued only two generic-related guidance documents. In 2016, there were seven. In 2017,...
August 15, 2022
This technical specifications document is to assist interested parties in electronically submitting individual case safety reports (ICSRs) (and ICSR attachments) to the Center for Drug Evaluation and...
September 15, 2015
FDA has accepted for review the first NDA for a “digital” medicine product. The product, which is produced by Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and Proteus Digital Health, is the first-ever medication...