Last week, I introduced a two-part series on transformation leadership. We defined transformational leadership, explored the concept, and discussed the benefits of adopting this approach.
Well, now you might be asking: How does an individual or organization become Transformational? You first have to know “where” you are. Think about it in terms of going to the mall. Have you ever interacted with one of the mall maps? In order to get where you want to go, you first must know where you are!
Kouzes and Posner Leadership Practices Inventory-Individual Contributor (LPI-IC) assessment can help you find out exactly where you are. This is an excellent 360-degree assessment tool. It illuminates both the effectiveness of your leaders and the level of commitment, engagement, and satisfaction of those that follow. It provides a Leadership Inventory that allows individuals to catalog their primary leadership element. Kouzes and Posner state that when Leaders are at their best, they:
Myers-Briggs assessments can also provide transformation elements. They have defined leadership styles in six areas:
Emotional Intelligence by Daniel Goleman states that emotions can be a very valuable tool in guiding our choices and decision-making. He emphasizes several styles of the effective leader
One of my favorites is Peter Senge’s Model of the Dance. He believes that all “movement” occurs while it is being inhibited. That is the Dance of Change. In order to engage the change:
Finally, Military Leadership in the United States has shown, first, the longer leaders and their subordinates are together the better likelihood transformational leadership is likely to occur within the team or group. Take away message – time to develop the team is critical. Second, transformational leadership was predictive of unit performance for both platoon leaders (short term with team) and sergeants (long term with team). Take away message - It takes both transactional and transformational leadership to be effective in the long and short term development process.
Conclusion
Effective leaders need to balance the use of authority regarding their interactions with subordinates. Leaders that do not effectively balance their authority will find that followers can reduce the leader’s authority by failing or refusing to accept the leader’s decisions. There is nothing worse for a leader than insubordination. Transformational leaders must focus on personal power and not always positional power to effectively change their team. As a transformational leader, one should be careful to balance transaction and transformation. Too much of a strength can be a weakness. Finally, Ecology suggests: Mutate or Die. Change is a requirement to survive. When considering the need for transformational leadership, the individual or collective leadership team has to first admit that change is necessary to become GREAT.
October 26, 2017
During the development phase of a new drug, great pains are taken to characterize the molecule and to run a myriad of laboratory and animal tests to determine the product attributes, toxicology...
October 26, 2017
Eliminating clinical trials would be extremely detrimental to the safety and well-being of people all over the world. On Friday, February 24th, The Washington Post published an article written by...
October 26, 2017
ASTM E2500 – Risk-based testing has been in play for several years now. By design, there is a significant opportunity to avoid many lifecycle costs without creating an adverse impact to quality or...