FDA Works to Reduce Medication Errors, Part One: Background & Overview of FDA’s Proprietary Naming Guidance

April 12, 2016

In September 2007, the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA IV) was reauthorized and expanded, broadening and strengthening FDA’s drug safety program.  As part of PDUFA’s reauthorization, the Agency established a number of performance goals related to the implementation of user fees, which FDA stated would be used to reduce medication errors.  More specifically, as one of its goals FDA agreed to publish a guidance document “on the contents of a complete submission package for a proposed proprietary name for a drug or biological product.”

“Medical Errors Listed at 8th Leading Cause of Death in US”

In 2000, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) published a report, entitled “To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System,” which named medical errors as the eighth leading cause of death in the United States.  Furthermore, the report also stated that among the most common medical errors are medication errors, which are attributed to roughly 7,000 deaths each year.  In response to these numbers, “the IOM recommended that FDA:

  • ‘Develop and enforce standards for the design of drug packaging and labeling that will maximize safety in use’ and
  • ‘Require pharmaceutical companies to test proposed drug names to identify and remedy potential sound-alike and look-alike confusion with existing drug names.’”

The IOM published a second report in 2006, entitled “Preventing Medication Errors,” which listed labeling and packaging issues as the cause of 33% of all medication errors, and 30% of all deaths resulting from medication errors. In this report, the IOM “urged FDA to incorporate better principles of cognitive and human factors engineering to address issues concerning information presentation in labeling and nomenclature.”

Proprietary Name Confusion & Medication Errors

In the US, physicians use the proprietary name as a critical identifier in selecting the appropriate therapy. As such, it is absolutely crucial that the product’s name can be interpreted accurately to ensure that patients receive the correct product.

When product names look and/or sound alike, the chances of medication error occurring increases significantly among prescription and nonprescription, or over-the-counter (OTC), products.  Because of this, FDA evaluates both the safety and promotional aspects of a product’s proposed proprietary name as a part of its premarket review process for drugs.

Safety Evaluation

“FDA’s safety review of a proposed proprietary name involves multiple methods to identify potentially problematic proprietary names, including the following:

  • A preliminary screening to identify common errors
  • A USAN17 stem search
  • An orthographic/phonological similarity assessment
  • Drug database searches, computational methods, and/or prescriptions simulation studies to test the likelihood of confusion between the proposed proprietary name and similar names.”

The failure modes and effect analysis (FMEA), which the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) defines as "a systematic tool for evaluating a process and identifying where and how it might fail,” is one of the tools used to conduct the medication error safety assessment of a product’s proposed proprietary name. After any potential look-alike and/or sound-alike names have been identified, FDA performs a FMEA of these names in order to determine where failures could occur with the proposed product.

To fully assess the safety of a proposed proprietary name, it is important to take product characteristics into consideration as well. According to the guidance, “product characteristics can act together with the orthographic and phonologic attributes of the proposed proprietary name (1) to increase the risk of confusion when there is an overlap in product characteristics among two or more products, or (2) in some instances, to decrease the risk of confusion by helping to differentiate products through dissimilarity.”

Promotional Evaluation

FDA also conducts a promotional review of proposed proprietary names, which “considers whether the name functions to overstate the efficacy, minimize the risk, broaden the indication, or make unsubstantiated superiority claims for the product, or is overly ‘fanciful’ by misleadingly implying unique effectiveness or composition, or is otherwise false or misleading.”

Final Guidance

On April 6, 2016, FDA published a final guidance entitled “Contents of a Complete Submission for the Evaluation of Proprietary Names,” which is aimed at reducing medication errors.

PDUFA IV Goal Dates

According to the PDUFA IV performance goals, the review clock for the evaluation of a proposed proprietary name begins when the submission is complete. If the submission is not complete, the guidance states that the FDA will notify the sponsor in writing. Once the submission is complete, the review clock is started and is based on the FDA’s stated date of receipt. According to the Agency’s review performance goals, FDA will complete its review and communicate a tentative acceptance or non-acceptance about the name within:

FDA notes that these performance goals do not apply proposed proprietary names submitted under an Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA).

When & Where to Send Submissions

According to the guidance, “FDA generally encourages applicants and sponsors to submit their requests for FDA review of proposed proprietary names as soon as they have the recommended supporting information as described in this guidance.” The request for a proposed name review should be sent as a separate submission to a pending NDA, BLA, or ANDA or supplement; if such an application is not available yet, the request should be submitted to an active IND.

Requests may be submitted in paper or electronic format. Applicants sending submissions in paper format must send “three copies of the submission the to the same address as the original application with which the proprietary name is associated.”

For additional information, including where to send submissions, view the FDA’s full guidance.

Contents of a Complete Submission

In its guidance, FDA provides an overview of what an application should included to ensure that a complete review can be conducted.

Interested in learning more about what this entails? Part two, entitled "FDA Works to Reduce Medication Errors, Part Two: Contents of a Complete Submission," has everything you need to know about the FDA's recommendations regarding the contents of a complete submission.
Are you developing a FDA-regulated product? Do you need to prepare an application for submission to FDA? We can help. For more information about our services, contact us today.


April 5, 2016

FDA Releases Anxiously Awaited Biosimilar Labeling Guidance, Part 1: An Overview of FDA’s Recommendations

On Thursday, March 31st, FDA released a highly anticipated draft guidance addressing the requirements for biosimilar labels. The draft guidance, entitled “Labeling for Biosimilar Products,” is...

January 13, 2016

FDA Extends Comment Period for OTC Sunscreen Draft Guidance

In November 2015, the FDA released a draft guidance entitled “Over-the-Counter Sunscreens: Safety and Effectiveness Data.” The draft guidance was published for comment purposes only, and shared the...

March 23, 2016

FDA & PDA Work to Align Manufacturing Goals with Patient Needs

On Tuesday March, 22nd FDA announced a public conference, entitled “Aligning Manufacturing Goals with Patient Needs through Successful Innovation and Compliance,” to be held in co-sponsorship with...