A doctor in Germany and a doctor in Canada ask the same question about the safety and effectiveness of a medication. They should receive the same high-quality response — clear, comprehensive, and clinically useful — regardless of where they’re based.
Yet when Medical Information functions operate independently, that isn’t always the reality. While responses will be accurate and compliant, differences in time, resources, and approach can mean one doctor receives more complete or actionable information than the other. That gap matters. It can influence clinical decision-making and, ultimately, patientcare.
Centralizing Medical Information functions is one of the most effective ways to ensure consistency in quality, completeness, and experience across regions.
The Efficiency Case for Centralization
When Medical Information teams work in silos, multiple people may be researching the same data, interpreting the same publications, and drafting similar responses, often in slightly different ways. Although all teams follow the same regulations, the effort invested and the structure of the final response can vary.
Centralization helps eliminate this variation. A single team can develop core responses using standardized templates, reference guides, and search strategies, ensuring a consistent and easy-to-follow format. This reduces duplication while maintaining high scientific quality.
Balancing Global Consistency with Local Needs
Some localization will always be required. Local language needs, country-specific regulatory agencies, or label differences may necessitate adjustments. However, the underlying data, publications, and evidence base remain the same.
By completing the majority of the work centrally, local teams can focus on meaningful adaptation rather than recreating content — saving time without sacrificing relevance.
The Real Challenge: How Can You Get Buy-In?
Centralizing a Medical Information function can take many forms, but one factor can undermine success early on: lack of engagement from local teams.
Local Medical Information teams often have deep customer knowledge and strong relationships. Standardization can feel like a loss of control or trust. Addressing these concerns requires listening, incorporating feedback, and providing visibility and oversight throughout the process.
While collaboration may initially slow progress, this investment leads to harmonized ways of working, stronger internal relationships, and consistent experiences for healthcare professionals globally.
How ProPharma Medical Information Services Can Help
ProPharma supports organizations in implementing centralized and hybrid Medical Information models that deliver consistent, high-quality responses while respecting local requirements. With established global processes, standardized content development, and collaborative engagement within-country teams, ProPharma helps reduce duplication, support buy-in, and maintain trusted relationships — allowing organizations to scale Medical Information services efficiently and confidently.
Author
TAGS: Medical Information
