Operational Qualifications "Worst Case" Conditions

December 15, 2015

Operational Qualifications "Worst Case" Conditions: A common principle in Operational Qualification (OQ) studies is to challenge processes under worst case conditions. A “worst case” condition or set of conditions are generally those parameters encompassing the upper and lower processing limits for a process and circumstances, within SOPs or batch records, which pose the greatest chance of product or process failure when compared to nominal conditions. Such conditions do not necessarily include product or process failure.

The primary elements of process validation are:

  • Installation Qualification (IQ)
  • Operational Qualification (OQ)
  • Performance Qualification (PQ)

Other elements of process validation include:

  • Test or analytical Method Validation (TMV)
  • Software Validation (SWV)
  • Construction Qualification, where applicable

Together, a process validation strategy may resemble the following:

Process Validation strategy

A common mistake in the OQ phase of a Process Validation (PV) approach or strategy is to not adequately identify and therefore not test actual worst case conditions. Many times, the study design will limit itself to a single condition, e.g., upper and lower dispensing volumes during a fill and finish operation. The following list includes many factors that are commonly overlooked but have influences on process variability.

  • Equipment capability
  • Equipment calibration and tooling
  • Ramp up times/storage times
  • Influence of diverse lots of components and raw materials
  • Influence of aging/shelf life of components and raw materials
  • Influence of different suppliers of the same or equivalent components and raw materials
  • Manufacturing conditions and environment
  • Influence of different operators on different shifts

Taking the broad array of other influences into account, the following points provide guidance on how to determine what the real worst case conditions may be.

  1. Prepare a list of every process step by name in sequential manufacturing order. Include all manufacturing, testing and inspection steps.
  2. Convert the list to a process map or flow diagram.
  3. Identify the specifications as per the process parameters of all individual processes. A matrix approach may be helpful.
    Matrix example
  4. Use pFMEA methods and techniques to identify and understand critical process parameters
  5. Use Design of Experiments (DOE) to determine process parameter and/or optimum setting variability.
  6. Establish a statistically valid sampling plan to ensure the quantity of product to be tested is based on a sound and defendable rationale.

Learn more about ProPharma Group's Process Validation services. 
Contact us to get in touch with our subject matter experts for a customized Compliance presentation.

Regulatory Sciences

March 20, 2019

How to Survive a Multi-Year Consent Decree

Operating a business under a Consent Decree is extremely difficult; there is no area of the business that goes unaffected. In addition to fines that could reach $500 million, a three to five-year...

Read the Full Article
Cleaning Validation Life Science Consulting

March 27, 2014

Cleaning Disaster or True Worst Case?

How robust are your cleaning validation measures? Could your storage procedures withstand the impacts of a fire within your facility, or would such a disaster set back your production time...

Read the Full Article
Compliance Life Science Consulting

September 11, 2013

Do Not Neglect GMP in your Serialization Project

In what for some may be a relatively chaotic run-up to meeting California’s 2015 serialization regulation, it is critical for serialization project managers to assure implementation falls within the...

Read the Full Article