Brexit: New Regulatory Opportunities in the United Kingdom

February 18, 2021

As the dust settles on the final Brexit deal, the UK’s Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) is forging new opportunities to innovate, increasing its efficiency, and collaborating with global regulators outside Europe. This shifting landscape offers the industry some new strategies to bring their products to the UK market.

Since the UK’s historic decision to leave the European Union (EU) in June 2016, the pharmaceutical industry has understandably focused its attention on business continuity. While politicians loudly debated the future relationship, EU pharmaceutical law continued to apply in the UK, and a number of regulatory changes were introduced to avoid disruption to supply chains. The most visible effect of Brexit was the relocation of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) from London to Amsterdam.

After months of political wrangling, the final trade deal was announced on December 24th, 2020 and became effective on January 1st, 2021. Since then, we have seen its effect on the regulation of medicines, which has been dramatic. The MHRA no longer plays any part in the EU’s regulatory network, not even as an observer. The UK lies completely outside the EU’s Single Market and the Customs Union; as such, it is treated as a “third country” for the purpose of medicine exports and imports. The exception is Northern Ireland, where EU legislation continues to apply in order to protect the peace agreement with the Republic of Ireland.

In general, industry has responded well to Brexit, establishing new legal entities within the EU where needed, and adjusting its operations to facilitate batch release and drug safety monitoring independently in both territories. So far, so good.

Opportunities for Efficiency and Collaboration

Now that the Brexit separation is complete, attention shifts to new opportunities. Registration of new medicines in the EU will continue similarly to the way it was handled before Brexit was concluded, but the UK has the chance to innovate. In the short term, EU pharmaceutical law has been copied over into UK national legislation. However, this is expected to diverge in the coming years. Furthermore, the MHRA already has extensive freedoms which allow it to operate more efficiently than the EMA, which runs a committee system with seats for 27 countries. As the European Commission President Ursula Von der Leyen recently admitted, “I'm aware that a country might be a speedboat and the EU more a tanker.”

There are already signs that the UK is able to approve orphan designations and pediatric plans more expeditiously than the EU. Scientifically, the MHRA may be more adventurous in approving products with limited efficacy data, and it may choose to impose less stringent post-marketing obligations. Clinical trials approvals were always a national matter, and the MHRA remains among the fastest authorities outside the US to approve new studies.

The UK is also looking outside Europe for regulatory collaboration. MHRA has joined the ACSS Consortium, sharing some regulatory evaluations with its counterparts in Canada, Switzerland, and Singapore. And in the field of oncology, MHRA has joined the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Project Orbis, a collaborative program that also involves Australia, Canada, Switzerland, Singapore, and Brazil.

As a major G7 economy, the UK remains an important pharmaceutical market. In the past, market access challenges have sometimes discouraged industry from launching expensive new products in the UK. Access to the country’s National Health Service involves a strict cost-effectiveness evaluation performed by the health technology assessment bodies, NICE (England and Wales) and SMC (Scotland). Recognizing this challenge, the new Innovative Licensing Access Program (ILAP) offers companies earlier dialogue and support from MHRA, NICE, and SMC.

Put ProPharma Group’s Experience to Work for You

The UK’s new regulatory innovations are still in their infancy, but ProPharma Group already has experience supporting our clients with UK marketing applications, ILAP, and Project Orbis. Contact our team of experts today to learn how we can provide consulting advice or support with execution related to Brexit compliance.

General Regulatory Regulatory Sciences

March 26, 2012

You Do Have a Voice – The FDA Rulemaking Process

Did you know that the FDA Rulemaking Process allows for the public to comment before procedural and scientific requirements go into effect? This is the case for both the debut and amendments to...

Read the Full Article
Regulatory Sciences

May 18, 2021

How to Prepare for the Three Type B Meetings with the FDA

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has laid out a drug development continuum that includes three milestones, or Type B meetings. Earliest is the Pre-IND meeting, the second is the End of Phase 2...

Read the Full Article
Agency Alerts General Regulatory

August 18, 2015

FDA Issues Warning Letter After Kim Kardashian Posts Selfie

On July 19, 2015, Kim Kardashian posted a “selfie” to her Instagram and Twitter accounts. You may be thinking “She does that all the time… Why would that matter to the FDA?” The selfie in question...

Read the Full Article